Saint George and the Dragon – Raphael’s Chivalric Masterpiece
Saint George and the Dragon (Raffaello Sanzio, 1506)
Raphael’s Saint George and the Dragon , a tiny oil panel (28.5 x 21.5 cm), is one of the most intense masterpieces of his youth. The painting features a vertical, dynamic composition: Saint George, dressed as a Christian knight in full armor, is depicted on horseback while planting a spear in the dragon at his feet. The saint’s serene, idealized gaze, the blue cloak fluttering behind him, and the diagonal of the spear create a balanced tension between movement and calm. The palette is bright: the horse is white with a silvery mane, Saint George’s cloak is a bright cobalt blue, and at the knight’s feet appears a brightly colored dragon (tawny brown skin and mint green head) with bat-like wings. In the background, straw-yellow hills dotted with dark green pine trees and two rusty orange towers stand out against a pale blue sky. The lighting is clear and diffuse, highlighting the smooth surfaces of the figures and the brilliant chromatic contrast. The figure of the princess, a secondary protagonist, is kneeling in prayer with her hands clasped; she wears a ruby-red dress and a transparent white veil, accentuating the atmosphere of gentle devotion. Finally, precious details underline the symbolism: on the calf of St. George is tied an indigo and gold band bearing the inscription «HONI» (motto of the Order of the Garter), and on the horse's collar is painted in gold the name «RAPHELLO», a figurative signature of the painter. In short, the work blends an elegant geometric harmony with vivacity of color and richness of symbolic details, embodying the Renaissance ideal of formal grace.
Historical and iconographic context
Saint George, a Roman warrior converted to Christianity and patron saint of chivalry, defeats the dragon according to a medieval legend: having saved a princess threatened by the beast, his victory leads to the conversion of the pagan king and his people. This narrative, a fight against evil and a victory for faith, explains the choice of the theme as a celebratory occasion. The panel was in fact created at the time when Guidobaldo da Montefeltro, Duke of Urbino (Raphael's youthful protector), had been appointed knight of the Order of the Garter by Henry VII of England in 1504. The painting clearly recalls this event: the squire wears the blue-gold sash of the Garter with the inscription "HONI" (abbreviation of Honi soit qui mal y pense , the motto of the Order). Recent studies show that the panel was intended for the English ambassador Gilbert Talbot, the king's emissary, rather than directly for Henry VII. In any case, the subject of Saint George symbolizes chivalric virtue and divine protection, ideal for celebrating a chivalric initiation and demonstrating the prestigious Renaissance culture of Urbino.
From a stylistic point of view, the influence of the Umbrian school of Pietro Perugino, Raphael's first master, can be recognized in its early forms, both in the perfect profile of the saint and in the delicate draperies and the serene balance of the scene. At the same time, Raphael's stay in Florence (from 1504) brought a new dynamism: the Leonardesque style (still alive in Florence at the time) is expressed here in the whirling movement of the horse and in the chiaroscuro that modulates the volume of the figures. In short : although there is no lack of Peruginesque reminiscences (soft looks, composed attitudes), the composition already reflects a perspective and energetic tension of Leonardesque ancestry. Some critics also note classical references in the statuary pose of Saint George, which may echo the well-known Saint George by Donatello preserved in Florence (underlining the heroic nobility of the subject). Together, these elements place the work at the crossroads of artistic traditions: Umbrian, Florentine, classical, which Raphael was assimilating in those years.
History of the work
The original patron is not known for certain, but it is likely that the painting was commissioned by the court of Urbino to celebrate the investiture of the duke. The panel, completed around 1505-1506, nevertheless soon reached England: by 1627 it was in the possession of William Herbert, third Earl of Pembroke, at Wilton House. One of the Herbert brothers probably then gave it to King Charles I of England in the 1630s. After the fall of the sovereign, the canvas was sold in 1651 at a public auction by the parliamentary government. It later reached France, becoming part of the rich collection of the merchant Pierre Crozat. In 1772, through the intercession of Denis Diderot, Catherine II of Russia purchased the entire Crozat collection for the Hermitage in St. Petersburg. The work remained on display at the Hermitage until 1931, when the Soviet government put many of his works of art up for sale to raise foreign currency. In March 1931, the panel was purchased by a consortium of gallery owners led by M. Knoedler and destined for the American industrialist Andrew W. Mellon. As part of that operation, Mellon acquired 21 paintings for a total of $6,654,000 (an exceptional sum for the time), including masterpieces by Van Eyck, Botticelli and Titian. In 1932, the work was donated to the Mellon Educational and Charitable Trust and, in 1937, included in the founding collection of the National Gallery of Art in Washington. Thus, Saint George and the Dragon became part of the main nucleus of the museum, marking the birth of one of the most prestigious collections of Renaissance painting in the world.
Comparison with the Louvre version
Raphael painted two small versions of the subject of Saint George; the one described above (c.1505–06) is in Washington, while the older version (c.1503–05) is in the Louvre, Paris. In both compositions the scene is similar: Saint George, riding his rearing horse, is about to spear the dragon, and a princess appears in the background. However, the rendering is different. In the Parisian panel the princess appears almost in flight, with her figure lopsided and her lance already broken on the ground (signs of a still lively action), while in the Washington painting she is shown kneeling in prayer, suggesting a moment of calm after the triumph. The color rendering also varies: the Louvre tends toward more muted and nuanced tones (typical of an even more Peruginesque style), while Washington shows stronger and brighter contrasts. In both cases, however, the compositional order remains discernible: the diagonals of the horse and the lance guide the eye, and the figures maintain an effect of solemn calm. The two versions are conceived as small-format "easel" paintings (even equipped with a checkerboard-patterned back, according to Lomazzo), intended for close-up admiration. Overall, the Washington and the Louvre should be read in dialogue: thematic similarity and stylistic differences reveal Raphael's artistic evolution between his early works and those slightly later.
Critical reception
Since the 16th century, Raphael has been celebrated as a supreme master of harmony and grace. Although Vasari does not describe this small panel in detail, he mentions it in the general framework of the artist's prodigious youthful maturity. In the centuries that followed, art historians have always recognized Saint George and the Dragon as a precious witness to Raphael's stylistic development. Bernard Berenson, for example, notes the "delightful simplicity" of Raphael's youthful language, combining Peruginesque composure with nascent Leonardesque vigor. Sir John Pope-Hennessy has included this work among the purest proofs of Renaissance balance, stressing how the idealized figures embody eternal values. More recently, David Alan Brown has observed how the panel manages to unite heroic virtues and purity of form: the confident figure of Saint George and the silent grace of the princess reflect a humanistic ideal of beauty and morality (anticipating themes that Raphael would explore in his Madonnas and the School of Athens). In essence, critics agree in considering the work as a symbolic synthesis of formal perfection and spiritual nobility. The chiaroscuro features and the archaic composure, for example, have been interpreted as a tribute to the lesson of Leonardo and Perugino, already evident in this painting. The solemn presence of the elements (aureolar halo, defeated dragon, harmonious landscape) also has a strong allegorical value that, according to high-ranking scholars, expresses a universal message of victory of good and faith.
Conclusions
The Saint George and the Dragon tablet thus emerges as a symbol of grace, moral strength and ideal beauty. The image of the young but serene saint, the calm heroism of the gesture with which he overpowers evil, the princess praying in contemplation, all combine to evoke a universal ideal of virtue. The formal purity of the work, obtained with subtle shades of color and a perfectly measured design, gives the scene an almost metaphysical aura. Although contained in a small format, the power of the painting is monumental: it echoes the noblest aspirations of Renaissance Humanism. Even today, in front of this painting, the sense of harmony and sacred beauty remains intact. Saint George and the Dragon still speaks to the human soul: its balanced strength and its eternal message of courage and grace inspire those who observe it, confirming the lasting value of the ideal it represents.
Sources: texts from the National Gallery of Art Washington artsandculture.google.com nga.gov nga.gov and art historian (analysis and publications cited) thehistoryofart.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org . Scholars include Vasari (Vite), Bernard Berenson, John Pope-Hennessy and David Alan Brown, all of whom agree in appreciating the formal and symbolic quality of this work.
🖌️ Relive the emotion of Saint George and the Dragon with our 1:1 scale museum replica → Discover the work
🖼 Discover Raphael's works in our dedicated collection .